huntbrotherspizza.com · Pizza · the Q3 2026 release
Hunt Brothers Pizza has 11 locations in Tennessee, its 6th-largest state of the 14 it operates in.
See where Hunt Brothers Pizza opens next →Every figure in this block is measured inside Tennessee. Nothing in it is a rate.
| Figure | Value | What it measures |
|---|---|---|
| Locations in Tennessee | 11 | Records the US location index holds for Hunt Brothers Pizza inside Tennessee right now — a snapshot at the Q3 2026 release, not a change over time. |
| Rank among Hunt Brothers Pizza's states | 6th of 14 | By location count, among the states where this brand clears the publication floor. |
| States with a published Hunt Brothers Pizza page | 14 | States where the brand has at least 3 locations. Smaller states exist in the index and are not published. |
| Locations across those states | 135 | The sum of the state table below. Lower than the national count, which includes states under the floor. |
| Tennessee's share of that footprint | 8.1% | A share of the published states only. Both halves are the same measure, so this is not a growth rate. |
| Index opening records in Tennessee | 117 | A DIFFERENT measure from the count above: openings detected inside the tracked window, not stores standing today. |
| Cities with index opening records in Tennessee | 76 | Distinct cities after folding spelling variants. See the city table. |
Cities with index opening records recorded for Hunt Brothers Pizza in Tennessee. The count beside each city is its openings — not its total Hunt Brothers Pizza locations.
| City | Index opening records | Share of Tennessee openings | Spellings folded |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossville | 9 | 7.7% | 1 |
| Greeneville | 5 | 4.3% | 1 |
| Soddy Daisy | 5 | 4.3% | 1 |
| Jamestown | 4 | 3.4% | 1 |
| Bristol | 3 | 2.6% | 1 |
| Chattanooga | 3 | 2.6% | 1 |
| Knoxville | 3 | 2.6% | 1 |
| Afton | 2 | 1.7% | 1 |
| Cleveland | 2 | 1.7% | 1 |
| Crab Orchard | 2 | 1.7% | 1 |
| Dandridge | 2 | 1.7% | 1 |
| Dayton | 2 | 1.7% | 1 |
| Georgetown | 2 | 1.7% | 1 |
| Kingston | 2 | 1.7% | 1 |
| La Follette | 2 | 1.7% | 1 |
| Livingston | 2 | 1.7% | 1 |
| Maryville | 2 | 1.7% | 1 |
| Niota | 2 | 1.7% | 1 |
| Oliver Springs | 2 | 1.7% | 1 |
| Pikeville | 2 | 1.7% | 1 |
| Sevierville | 2 | 1.7% | 1 |
| Tazewell | 2 | 1.7% | 1 |
| Ten Mile | 2 | 1.7% | 1 |
| Bean Station | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Bluff City | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Bulls Gap | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Butler | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Byrdstown | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Charleston | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Church Hill | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Clairfield | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Clarkrange | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Clinton | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Decatur | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Deer Lodge | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Delano | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Englewood | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Friendsville | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Harriman | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Harrogate | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Hermitage | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Hixson | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Jellico | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Jonesborough | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Kingsport | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Lebanon | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Loudon | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Louisville | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Maynardville | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Memphis | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Monroe | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Monterey | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Mountain City | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| New Tazewell | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Ocoee | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Old Fort | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Pigeon Forge | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Pioneer | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Powell | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Robbins | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Rogersville | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Rutledge | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Sale Creek | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Sharps Chapel | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Signal Mountain | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Sparta | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Spencer | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Spring City | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Sunbright | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Surgoinsville | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Sweetwater | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Tellico Plains | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Unicoi | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Walland | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Wartburg | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
| Winfield | 1 | 0.9% | 1 |
The brand's whole published footprint, largest first. Tennessee is highlighted in place.
| Rank | State | Locations | Share of footprint |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Georgia | 19 | 14.1% |
| 2 | Virginia | 14 | 10.4% |
| 3 | North Carolina | 12 | 8.9% |
| 4 | Wisconsin | 12 | 8.9% |
| 5 | Missouri | 11 | 8.1% |
| 6 | Tennessee — this page | 11 | 8.1% |
| 7 | Michigan | 10 | 7.4% |
| 8 | Kansas | 9 | 6.7% |
| 9 | Kentucky | 9 | 6.7% |
| 10 | Indiana | 7 | 5.2% |
| 11 | Illinois | 6 | 4.4% |
| 12 | North Dakota | 6 | 4.4% |
| 13 | Texas | 5 | 3.7% |
| 14 | South Carolina | 4 | 3.0% |
Context for the local figures above. None of it is a Tennessee number.
| Figure | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| US locations | 152 | At the latest vintage, Q3 2026. |
| US locations at the window start | 764 | The first tracked vintage, Q4 2024. |
| Net new over the window | -612 | The difference between the two counts above. A count movement, not a count of openings. |
| Growth over the window | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | Percentage change in the count between the first and latest vintages, nationwide. |
| Growth as a multiple | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | The same movement stated as a multiple of the starting count. |
| Growth against its category | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | The brand's percentage change minus its category's, so a rising tide is subtracted out. |
| Mean quarterly change | -1,294 | Average count movement per vintage step. The default ranking key on the hub. |
| Verified openings in the window | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | Individually dated location records new to the index inside the window, nationwide. |
| Openings pace, latest step | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | Verified openings per 91 days over the most recent vintage step. |
| Openings pace, prior step | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | The same measure one step earlier. |
| Direction | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | Accelerating, steady or slowing, decided on the two paces at the precision they are printed. |
| Latest pace as a share of the base | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | The latest pace over the store count at that step's start vintage. |
| Prior pace as a share of the base | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | The same measure one step earlier. |
| Reported openings pace, latest | +43 | The server's own pre-aggregated pace. Shown because the page ranks on the series-derived figure above and the two must agree. |
| Reported openings pace, prior | +35 | The same, one step earlier. |
| Largest single step's share of the change | — | One release carrying most of the movement is the signature of a data-coverage artifact rather than of openings. |
| Steps that moved the same direction | 86% | A real buildout moves one way most quarters. This and the row above are the credibility filter. |
| Passes the credibility filter | no | Largest step at or under half the movement, most steps in one direction, and net new above zero. |
| Cleared to print a percentage | no | Whether the index's coverage of this brand is mature enough for a rate to mean anything. |
| Openings corroborated by coverage | — | Share of the openings that agree with the count series over the same step. |
| Records matching the brand's own website | 100% | Share of index records whose website resolves to this domain. |
| Records sharing an address with another operator | 17% | High values mean host locations, sibling banners or shared kitchens rather than the chain's own leases. |
| Entity class | chain | Anything other than a chain is not published as a brand page in this state tier. |
| Category | Dining and Drinking > Restaurant > Pizzeria | The index's own category path for this brand. |
| Segment | Pizza | The published grouping the category rolls up to. |
| Match name in the index | hunt brothers pizza | The string the location index matches records against. Rarely the display name. |
| Display name | Hunt Brothers Pizza | As published. Some domains carry a read-time repair where the index's most frequent name is a department's. |
| Domain | huntbrotherspizza.com | The key every table on this tier is joined on. |
| Tracked window | 8 vintages, Q4 2024 to Q3 2026 | How many quarterly releases this brand has been measured across. |
| Vintage stamps | 2024-11-19|2024-12-03|2025-03-06|2025-06-10|2025-09-09|2025-12-16|2026-03-18|2026-07-09 | Every release these figures were built from, oldest first, pipe-separated. It is a LIST of dates rather than one date, which is why nothing on this page prints it as a timestamp. |
The national count series behind the figures above. Both readings of it — the raw count and the indexed one — are columns here.
| Quarter | Vintage date | US locations | Indexed | Change vs prior |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 2024 | 2024-11-19 | 764 | 100 | — |
| Q4 2024 | 2024-12-03 | 764 | 100 | 0 |
| Q1 2025 | 2025-03-06 | 767 | 100 | +3 |
| Q2 2025 | 2025-06-10 | 1,073 | 140 | +306 |
| Q3 2025 | 2025-09-09 | 2,633 | 345 | +1,560 |
| Q4 2025 | 2025-12-16 | 3,756 | 492 | +1,123 |
| Q1 2026 | 2026-03-18 | 99 | 13 | -3,657 |
| Q3 2026 | 2026-07-09 | 152 | 20 | +53 |
Each row is the difference between two consecutive releases, so there is one fewer step than there are quarters above.
| Step ends | Quarter | Openings | Step length | Pace | Batch-suspect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2024 | Q4 2024 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0% |
| Mar 6, 2025 | Q1 2025 | 0 | 93 | 0 | 0% |
| Jun 10, 2025 | Q2 2025 | 325 | 96 | +308 | 98% |
| Sep 9, 2025 | Q3 2025 | 1,562 | 91 | +1,562 | 0% |
| Dec 16, 2025 | Q4 2025 | 1,122 | 98 | +1,042 | 98% |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Q1 2026 | 35 | 92 | +35 | 91% |
| Jul 9, 2026 | Q3 2026 | 54 | 113 | +43 | 89% |
Cobroker ranks the Tennessee trade areas that look like the ones Hunt Brothers Pizza already performs in — demographics, co-tenancy, traffic.
Run the free report →