huntbrotherspizza.com · Pizza · the Q3 2026 release
Hunt Brothers Pizza has 9 locations in Kentucky, its 9th-largest state of the 14 it operates in.
See where Hunt Brothers Pizza opens next →Every figure in this block is measured inside Kentucky. Nothing in it is a rate.
| Figure | Value | What it measures |
|---|---|---|
| Locations in Kentucky | 9 | Records the US location index holds for Hunt Brothers Pizza inside Kentucky right now — a snapshot at the Q3 2026 release, not a change over time. |
| Rank among Hunt Brothers Pizza's states | 9th of 14 | By location count, among the states where this brand clears the publication floor. |
| States with a published Hunt Brothers Pizza page | 14 | States where the brand has at least 3 locations. Smaller states exist in the index and are not published. |
| Locations across those states | 135 | The sum of the state table below. Lower than the national count, which includes states under the floor. |
| Kentucky's share of that footprint | 6.7% | A share of the published states only. Both halves are the same measure, so this is not a growth rate. |
| Index opening records in Kentucky | 306 | A DIFFERENT measure from the count above: openings detected inside the tracked window, not stores standing today. |
| Cities with index opening records in Kentucky | 189 | Distinct cities after folding spelling variants. See the city table. |
Cities with index opening records recorded for Hunt Brothers Pizza in Kentucky. The count beside each city is its openings — not its total Hunt Brothers Pizza locations.
| City | Index opening records | Share of Kentucky openings | Spellings folded |
|---|---|---|---|
| London | 10 | 3.3% | 1 |
| Louisville | 10 | 3.3% | 1 |
| Corbin | 6 | 2.0% | 1 |
| Hazard | 6 | 2.0% | 1 |
| Henderson | 6 | 2.0% | 1 |
| Owensboro | 6 | 2.0% | 1 |
| Mount Sterling | 5 | 1.6% | 1 |
| Shepherdsville | 5 | 1.6% | 1 |
| Williamsburg | 5 | 1.6% | 1 |
| Campbellsville | 4 | 1.3% | 1 |
| Elizabethtown | 4 | 1.3% | 1 |
| Lexington | 4 | 1.3% | 1 |
| Mammoth Cave | 4 | 1.3% | 1 |
| Albany | 3 | 1.0% | 1 |
| Danville | 3 | 1.0% | 1 |
| Flemingsburg | 3 | 1.0% | 1 |
| Frankfort | 3 | 1.0% | 1 |
| Hopkinsville | 3 | 1.0% | 1 |
| Leitchfield | 3 | 1.0% | 1 |
| Liberty | 3 | 1.0% | 1 |
| Monticello | 3 | 1.0% | 1 |
| Nicholasville | 3 | 1.0% | 1 |
| Richmond | 3 | 1.0% | 1 |
| Salyersville | 3 | 1.0% | 1 |
| Somerset | 3 | 1.0% | 1 |
| West Liberty | 3 | 1.0% | 1 |
| Bowling Green | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Brandenburg | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Brodhead | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Burkesville | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Calhoun | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Carlisle | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Cawood | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Columbia | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Coxs Creek | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Crab Orchard | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Crestwood | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Cub Run | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Cynthiana | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Dawson Springs | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| East Bernstadt | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Elkhorn City | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Ezel | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Glasgow | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Jeffersonville | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| McKee | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| New Haven | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Oak Grove | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Owenton | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Russell Springs | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Russellville | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Taylorsville | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Whitesburg | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Winchester | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Yosemite | 2 | 0.7% | 1 |
| Adairville | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Ashcamp | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Augusta | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Bardstown | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Bear Branch | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Bedford | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Berea | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Big Creek | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Big Laurel | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Bloomfield | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Bonnieville | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Bradfordsville | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Bremen | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Brooks | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Buffalo | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Bulan | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Burnside | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Cadiz | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Carrollton | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Central City | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Chavies | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Clarkson | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Clay | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Closplint | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Cloverport | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Cornettsville | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Cromwell | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Cumberland | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Dixon | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Drakesboro | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Eastview | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Eddyville | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Edmonton | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Ekron | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Elkton | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Eminence | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Eubank | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Evarts | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Ewing | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Falls Of Rough | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Falmouth | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Fisherville | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Flat Lick | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Franklin | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Garrison | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Georgetown | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Girdler | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Graham | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Grand Rivers | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Gravel Switch | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Grayson | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Harlan | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Hartford | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Hodgenville | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Horse Cave | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Hoskinston | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Hulen | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Hyden | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Inez | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Irvine | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Jackson | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Jamestown | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Jenkins | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Kimper | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Knifley | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Lancaster | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Lawrenceburg | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Lebanon | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Lebanon Junction | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Lewisburg | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Lily | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Livermore | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Loretto | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Louisa | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Lowmansville | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Lucas | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Mackville | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Madisonville | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Magnolia | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Mannsville | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Martin | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Mayslick | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Midway | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Milton | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Morehead | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Morganfield | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Mount Vernon | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Mousie | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Munfordville | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| New Castle | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Nippa | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Owingsville | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Paris | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Perryville | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Philpot | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Pikeville | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Pleasureville | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Poole | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Princeton | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Raywick | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Robards | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Rockholds | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Rush | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Sacramento | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Salem | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Salvisa | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Science Hill | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Sebree | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Smilax | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Smithland | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Smiths Grove | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Springfield | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Stamping Ground | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Stanford | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Stanton | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Stanville | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Sturgis | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Summer Shade | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Tompkinsville | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Topmost | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Uniontown | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Upton | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Utica | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Vanceburg | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Vine Grove | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Waco | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Wallins Creek | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Waverly | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Waynesburg | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| West Point | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Whitesville | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Williamstown | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Willisburg | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
| Wilmore | 1 | 0.3% | 1 |
The brand's whole published footprint, largest first. Kentucky is highlighted in place.
| Rank | State | Locations | Share of footprint |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Georgia | 19 | 14.1% |
| 2 | Virginia | 14 | 10.4% |
| 3 | North Carolina | 12 | 8.9% |
| 4 | Wisconsin | 12 | 8.9% |
| 5 | Missouri | 11 | 8.1% |
| 6 | Tennessee | 11 | 8.1% |
| 7 | Michigan | 10 | 7.4% |
| 8 | Kansas | 9 | 6.7% |
| 9 | Kentucky — this page | 9 | 6.7% |
| 10 | Indiana | 7 | 5.2% |
| 11 | Illinois | 6 | 4.4% |
| 12 | North Dakota | 6 | 4.4% |
| 13 | Texas | 5 | 3.7% |
| 14 | South Carolina | 4 | 3.0% |
Context for the local figures above. None of it is a Kentucky number.
| Figure | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| US locations | 152 | At the latest vintage, Q3 2026. |
| US locations at the window start | 764 | The first tracked vintage, Q4 2024. |
| Net new over the window | -612 | The difference between the two counts above. A count movement, not a count of openings. |
| Growth over the window | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | Percentage change in the count between the first and latest vintages, nationwide. |
| Growth as a multiple | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | The same movement stated as a multiple of the starting count. |
| Growth against its category | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | The brand's percentage change minus its category's, so a rising tide is subtracted out. |
| Mean quarterly change | -1,294 | Average count movement per vintage step. The default ranking key on the hub. |
| Verified openings in the window | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | Individually dated location records new to the index inside the window, nationwide. |
| Openings pace, latest step | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | Verified openings per 91 days over the most recent vintage step. |
| Openings pace, prior step | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | The same measure one step earlier. |
| Direction | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | Accelerating, steady or slowing, decided on the two paces at the precision they are printed. |
| Latest pace as a share of the base | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | The latest pace over the store count at that step's start vintage. |
| Prior pace as a share of the base | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | The same measure one step earlier. |
| Reported openings pace, latest | +43 | The server's own pre-aggregated pace. Shown because the page ranks on the series-derived figure above and the two must agree. |
| Reported openings pace, prior | +35 | The same, one step earlier. |
| Largest single step's share of the change | — | One release carrying most of the movement is the signature of a data-coverage artifact rather than of openings. |
| Steps that moved the same direction | 86% | A real buildout moves one way most quarters. This and the row above are the credibility filter. |
| Passes the credibility filter | no | Largest step at or under half the movement, most steps in one direction, and net new above zero. |
| Cleared to print a percentage | no | Whether the index's coverage of this brand is mature enough for a rate to mean anything. |
| Openings corroborated by coverage | — | Share of the openings that agree with the count series over the same step. |
| Records matching the brand's own website | 100% | Share of index records whose website resolves to this domain. |
| Records sharing an address with another operator | 17% | High values mean host locations, sibling banners or shared kitchens rather than the chain's own leases. |
| Entity class | chain | Anything other than a chain is not published as a brand page in this state tier. |
| Category | Dining and Drinking > Restaurant > Pizzeria | The index's own category path for this brand. |
| Segment | Pizza | The published grouping the category rolls up to. |
| Match name in the index | hunt brothers pizza | The string the location index matches records against. Rarely the display name. |
| Display name | Hunt Brothers Pizza | As published. Some domains carry a read-time repair where the index's most frequent name is a department's. |
| Domain | huntbrotherspizza.com | The key every table on this tier is joined on. |
| Tracked window | 8 vintages, Q4 2024 to Q3 2026 | How many quarterly releases this brand has been measured across. |
| Vintage stamps | 2024-11-19|2024-12-03|2025-03-06|2025-06-10|2025-09-09|2025-12-16|2026-03-18|2026-07-09 | Every release these figures were built from, oldest first, pipe-separated. It is a LIST of dates rather than one date, which is why nothing on this page prints it as a timestamp. |
The national count series behind the figures above. Both readings of it — the raw count and the indexed one — are columns here.
| Quarter | Vintage date | US locations | Indexed | Change vs prior |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 2024 | 2024-11-19 | 764 | 100 | — |
| Q4 2024 | 2024-12-03 | 764 | 100 | 0 |
| Q1 2025 | 2025-03-06 | 767 | 100 | +3 |
| Q2 2025 | 2025-06-10 | 1,073 | 140 | +306 |
| Q3 2025 | 2025-09-09 | 2,633 | 345 | +1,560 |
| Q4 2025 | 2025-12-16 | 3,756 | 492 | +1,123 |
| Q1 2026 | 2026-03-18 | 99 | 13 | -3,657 |
| Q3 2026 | 2026-07-09 | 152 | 20 | +53 |
Each row is the difference between two consecutive releases, so there is one fewer step than there are quarters above.
| Step ends | Quarter | Openings | Step length | Pace | Batch-suspect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2024 | Q4 2024 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0% |
| Mar 6, 2025 | Q1 2025 | 0 | 93 | 0 | 0% |
| Jun 10, 2025 | Q2 2025 | 325 | 96 | +308 | 98% |
| Sep 9, 2025 | Q3 2025 | 1,562 | 91 | +1,562 | 0% |
| Dec 16, 2025 | Q4 2025 | 1,122 | 98 | +1,042 | 98% |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Q1 2026 | 35 | 92 | +35 | 91% |
| Jul 9, 2026 | Q3 2026 | 54 | 113 | +43 | 89% |
Cobroker ranks the Kentucky trade areas that look like the ones Hunt Brothers Pizza already performs in — demographics, co-tenancy, traffic.
Run the free report →