huntbrotherspizza.com · Pizza · the Q3 2026 release
Hunt Brothers Pizza has 4 locations in South Carolina, its 14th-largest state of the 14 it operates in.
See where Hunt Brothers Pizza opens next →Every figure in this block is measured inside South Carolina. Nothing in it is a rate.
| Figure | Value | What it measures |
|---|---|---|
| Locations in South Carolina | 4 | Records the US location index holds for Hunt Brothers Pizza inside South Carolina right now — a snapshot at the Q3 2026 release, not a change over time. |
| Rank among Hunt Brothers Pizza's states | 14th of 14 | By location count, among the states where this brand clears the publication floor. |
| States with a published Hunt Brothers Pizza page | 14 | States where the brand has at least 3 locations. Smaller states exist in the index and are not published. |
| Locations across those states | 135 | The sum of the state table below. Lower than the national count, which includes states under the floor. |
| South Carolina's share of that footprint | 3.0% | A share of the published states only. Both halves are the same measure, so this is not a growth rate. |
| Index opening records in South Carolina | 247 | A DIFFERENT measure from the count above: openings detected inside the tracked window, not stores standing today. |
| Cities with index opening records in South Carolina | 140 | Distinct cities after folding spelling variants. See the city table. |
Cities with index opening records recorded for Hunt Brothers Pizza in South Carolina. The count beside each city is its openings — not its total Hunt Brothers Pizza locations.
| City | Index opening records | Share of South Carolina openings | Spellings folded |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anderson | 11 | 4.5% | 1 |
| Greenwood | 8 | 3.2% | 1 |
| Conway | 7 | 2.8% | 1 |
| Aiken | 6 | 2.4% | 1 |
| Sumter | 6 | 2.4% | 1 |
| Gaffney | 4 | 1.6% | 1 |
| Georgetown | 4 | 1.6% | 1 |
| Lexington | 4 | 1.6% | 1 |
| Manning | 4 | 1.6% | 1 |
| North Charleston | 4 | 1.6% | 1 |
| Westminster | 4 | 1.6% | 1 |
| Belton | 3 | 1.2% | 1 |
| Bishopville | 3 | 1.2% | 1 |
| Central | 3 | 1.2% | 1 |
| Columbia | 3 | 1.2% | 1 |
| Easley | 3 | 1.2% | 1 |
| Effingham | 3 | 1.2% | 1 |
| Gilbert | 3 | 1.2% | 1 |
| Iva | 3 | 1.2% | 1 |
| Johnsonville | 3 | 1.2% | 1 |
| Lancaster | 3 | 1.2% | 1 |
| Liberty | 3 | 1.2% | 1 |
| Loris | 3 | 1.2% | 1 |
| Rock Hill | 3 | 1.2% | 1 |
| Seneca | 3 | 1.2% | 1 |
| Spartanburg | 3 | 1.2% | 1 |
| Abbeville | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Blacksburg | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Bonneau | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Cheraw | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Cross | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Dillon | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Fort Mill | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Gaston | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Gray Court | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Greeleyville | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Greer | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Hemingway | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Honea Path | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Hopkins | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Kershaw | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Laurens | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Little River | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Moncks Corner | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Orangeburg | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Pelzer | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Pickens | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Piedmont | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Ridgeville | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Simpsonville | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Union | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Winnsboro | 2 | 0.8% | 1 |
| Andrews | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Barnwell | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Batesburg | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Batesburg Leesville | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Beaufort | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Bennettsville | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Bowman | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Calhoun Falls | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Camden | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Cassatt | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Catawba | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Cayce | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Charleston | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Chesnee | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Cleveland | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Clover | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Cowpens | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Cross Hill | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Donalds | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Dorchester | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Eastover | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Elgin | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Elko | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Eutawville | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Fair Play | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Fairfax | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Florence | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Great Falls | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Green Sea | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Hamer | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Harleyville | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Hartsville | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Heath Springs | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Hickory Grove | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Hilton Head Island | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Holly Hill | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Inman | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Irmo | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Joanna | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Johnston | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Lake City | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Lake View | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Lamar | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Leesville | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Lugoff | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Lynchburg | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Marietta | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Marion | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Mc Bee | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Mc Clellanville | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Mc Coll | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Mc Connells | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Mc Cormick | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Monetta | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Mountain Rest | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Mullins | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Murrells Inlet | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Myrtle Beach | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Ninety Six | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| North | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Norway | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Patrick | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Paxville | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Pelion | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Pendleton | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Pineville | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Ridge Spring | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Ridgeland | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Ridgeway | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Rowesville | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Ruffin | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Saint Matthews | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Saint Stephen | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Salem | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Saluda | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Sharon | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Six Mile | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Starr | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Summerville | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Taylors | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Timmonsville | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Vance | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Walhalla | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Ware Shoals | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| West Columbia | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| West Union | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Whitmire | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
| Windsor | 1 | 0.4% | 1 |
The brand's whole published footprint, largest first. South Carolina is highlighted in place.
| Rank | State | Locations | Share of footprint |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Georgia | 19 | 14.1% |
| 2 | Virginia | 14 | 10.4% |
| 3 | North Carolina | 12 | 8.9% |
| 4 | Wisconsin | 12 | 8.9% |
| 5 | Missouri | 11 | 8.1% |
| 6 | Tennessee | 11 | 8.1% |
| 7 | Michigan | 10 | 7.4% |
| 8 | Kansas | 9 | 6.7% |
| 9 | Kentucky | 9 | 6.7% |
| 10 | Indiana | 7 | 5.2% |
| 11 | Illinois | 6 | 4.4% |
| 12 | North Dakota | 6 | 4.4% |
| 13 | Texas | 5 | 3.7% |
| 14 | South Carolina — this page | 4 | 3.0% |
Context for the local figures above. None of it is a South Carolina number.
| Figure | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| US locations | 152 | At the latest vintage, Q3 2026. |
| US locations at the window start | 764 | The first tracked vintage, Q4 2024. |
| Net new over the window | -612 | The difference between the two counts above. A count movement, not a count of openings. |
| Growth over the window | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | Percentage change in the count between the first and latest vintages, nationwide. |
| Growth as a multiple | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | The same movement stated as a multiple of the starting count. |
| Growth against its category | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | The brand's percentage change minus its category's, so a rising tide is subtracted out. |
| Mean quarterly change | -1,294 | Average count movement per vintage step. The default ranking key on the hub. |
| Verified openings in the window | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | Individually dated location records new to the index inside the window, nationwide. |
| Openings pace, latest step | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | Verified openings per 91 days over the most recent vintage step. |
| Openings pace, prior step | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | The same measure one step earlier. |
| Direction | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | Accelerating, steady or slowing, decided on the two paces at the precision they are printed. |
| Latest pace as a share of the base | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | The latest pace over the store count at that step's start vintage. |
| Prior pace as a share of the base | withheld: more records were added than the chain has ever had — see the note under this table | The same measure one step earlier. |
| Reported openings pace, latest | +43 | The server's own pre-aggregated pace. Shown because the page ranks on the series-derived figure above and the two must agree. |
| Reported openings pace, prior | +35 | The same, one step earlier. |
| Largest single step's share of the change | — | One release carrying most of the movement is the signature of a data-coverage artifact rather than of openings. |
| Steps that moved the same direction | 86% | A real buildout moves one way most quarters. This and the row above are the credibility filter. |
| Passes the credibility filter | no | Largest step at or under half the movement, most steps in one direction, and net new above zero. |
| Cleared to print a percentage | no | Whether the index's coverage of this brand is mature enough for a rate to mean anything. |
| Openings corroborated by coverage | — | Share of the openings that agree with the count series over the same step. |
| Records matching the brand's own website | 100% | Share of index records whose website resolves to this domain. |
| Records sharing an address with another operator | 17% | High values mean host locations, sibling banners or shared kitchens rather than the chain's own leases. |
| Entity class | chain | Anything other than a chain is not published as a brand page in this state tier. |
| Category | Dining and Drinking > Restaurant > Pizzeria | The index's own category path for this brand. |
| Segment | Pizza | The published grouping the category rolls up to. |
| Match name in the index | hunt brothers pizza | The string the location index matches records against. Rarely the display name. |
| Display name | Hunt Brothers Pizza | As published. Some domains carry a read-time repair where the index's most frequent name is a department's. |
| Domain | huntbrotherspizza.com | The key every table on this tier is joined on. |
| Tracked window | 8 vintages, Q4 2024 to Q3 2026 | How many quarterly releases this brand has been measured across. |
| Vintage stamps | 2024-11-19|2024-12-03|2025-03-06|2025-06-10|2025-09-09|2025-12-16|2026-03-18|2026-07-09 | Every release these figures were built from, oldest first, pipe-separated. It is a LIST of dates rather than one date, which is why nothing on this page prints it as a timestamp. |
The national count series behind the figures above. Both readings of it — the raw count and the indexed one — are columns here.
| Quarter | Vintage date | US locations | Indexed | Change vs prior |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 2024 | 2024-11-19 | 764 | 100 | — |
| Q4 2024 | 2024-12-03 | 764 | 100 | 0 |
| Q1 2025 | 2025-03-06 | 767 | 100 | +3 |
| Q2 2025 | 2025-06-10 | 1,073 | 140 | +306 |
| Q3 2025 | 2025-09-09 | 2,633 | 345 | +1,560 |
| Q4 2025 | 2025-12-16 | 3,756 | 492 | +1,123 |
| Q1 2026 | 2026-03-18 | 99 | 13 | -3,657 |
| Q3 2026 | 2026-07-09 | 152 | 20 | +53 |
Each row is the difference between two consecutive releases, so there is one fewer step than there are quarters above.
| Step ends | Quarter | Openings | Step length | Pace | Batch-suspect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2024 | Q4 2024 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0% |
| Mar 6, 2025 | Q1 2025 | 0 | 93 | 0 | 0% |
| Jun 10, 2025 | Q2 2025 | 325 | 96 | +308 | 98% |
| Sep 9, 2025 | Q3 2025 | 1,562 | 91 | +1,562 | 0% |
| Dec 16, 2025 | Q4 2025 | 1,122 | 98 | +1,042 | 98% |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Q1 2026 | 35 | 92 | +35 | 91% |
| Jul 9, 2026 | Q3 2026 | 54 | 113 | +43 | 89% |
Cobroker ranks the South Carolina trade areas that look like the ones Hunt Brothers Pizza already performs in — demographics, co-tenancy, traffic.
Run the free report →