t-mobile.com · Specialty Retail · the Q3 2026 release
T-Mobile has 269 locations in Washington, its 10th-largest state of the 50 it operates in.
See where T-Mobile opens next →Every figure in this block is measured inside Washington. Nothing in it is a rate.
| Figure | Value | What it measures |
|---|---|---|
| Locations in Washington | 269 | Records the US location index holds for T-Mobile inside Washington right now — a snapshot at the Q3 2026 release, not a change over time. |
| Rank among T-Mobile's states | 10th of 50 | By location count, among the states where this brand clears the publication floor. |
| States with a published T-Mobile page | 50 | States where the brand has at least 3 locations. Smaller states exist in the index and are not published. |
| Locations across those states | 9,080 | The sum of the state table below. Lower than the national count, which includes states under the floor. |
| Washington's share of that footprint | 3.0% | A share of the published states only. Both halves are the same measure, so this is not a growth rate. |
| Index opening records in Washington | 13 | A DIFFERENT measure from the count above: openings detected inside the tracked window, not stores standing today. |
| Cities with index opening records in Washington | 13 | Distinct cities after folding spelling variants. See the city table. |
Cities with index opening records recorded for T-Mobile in Washington. The count beside each city is its openings — not its total T-Mobile locations.
| City | Index opening records | Share of Washington openings | Spellings folded |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bellevue | 1 | 7.7% | 1 |
| Burlington | 1 | 7.7% | 1 |
| Camas | 1 | 7.7% | 1 |
| Centralia | 1 | 7.7% | 1 |
| Chehalis | 1 | 7.7% | 1 |
| Deer Park | 1 | 7.7% | 1 |
| Oak Harbor | 1 | 7.7% | 1 |
| Puyallup | 1 | 7.7% | 1 |
| Richland | 1 | 7.7% | 1 |
| Ridgefield | 1 | 7.7% | 1 |
| Seattle | 1 | 7.7% | 1 |
| Silverdale | 1 | 7.7% | 1 |
| Sunnyside | 1 | 7.7% | 1 |
The brand's whole published footprint, largest first. Washington is highlighted in place.
| Rank | State | Locations | Share of footprint |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | California | 1,069 | 11.8% |
| 2 | Texas | 888 | 9.8% |
| 3 | Florida | 734 | 8.1% |
| 4 | New York | 513 | 5.6% |
| 5 | Illinois | 376 | 4.1% |
| 6 | Pennsylvania | 344 | 3.8% |
| 7 | Georgia | 305 | 3.4% |
| 8 | Ohio | 295 | 3.2% |
| 9 | Michigan | 293 | 3.2% |
| 10 | Washington — this page | 269 | 3.0% |
| 11 | Virginia | 261 | 2.9% |
| 12 | New Jersey | 253 | 2.8% |
| 13 | North Carolina | 223 | 2.5% |
| 14 | Arizona | 210 | 2.3% |
| 15 | Colorado | 181 | 2.0% |
| 16 | Missouri | 176 | 1.9% |
| 17 | Tennessee | 169 | 1.9% |
| 18 | Maryland | 164 | 1.8% |
| 19 | Minnesota | 157 | 1.7% |
| 20 | Indiana | 154 | 1.7% |
| 21 | Massachusetts | 147 | 1.6% |
| 22 | Alabama | 146 | 1.6% |
| 23 | South Carolina | 139 | 1.5% |
| 24 | Wisconsin | 131 | 1.4% |
| 25 | Oregon | 123 | 1.4% |
| 26 | Utah | 112 | 1.2% |
| 27 | Louisiana | 111 | 1.2% |
| 28 | Oklahoma | 109 | 1.2% |
| 29 | Connecticut | 106 | 1.2% |
| 30 | Kentucky | 93 | 1.0% |
| 31 | Kansas | 90 | 1.0% |
| 32 | Nevada | 78 | 0.9% |
| 33 | Iowa | 70 | 0.8% |
| 34 | New Mexico | 70 | 0.8% |
| 35 | Arkansas | 67 | 0.7% |
| 36 | Mississippi | 64 | 0.7% |
| 37 | West Virginia | 62 | 0.7% |
| 38 | Idaho | 53 | 0.6% |
| 39 | Hawaii | 42 | 0.5% |
| 40 | New Hampshire | 34 | 0.4% |
| 41 | Nebraska | 32 | 0.4% |
| 42 | Delaware | 28 | 0.3% |
| 43 | Montana | 26 | 0.3% |
| 44 | Rhode Island | 25 | 0.3% |
| 45 | Maine | 22 | 0.2% |
| 46 | South Dakota | 17 | 0.2% |
| 47 | Wyoming | 17 | 0.2% |
| 48 | North Dakota | 16 | 0.2% |
| 49 | District of Columbia | 12 | 0.1% |
| 50 | Vermont | 4 | 0.0% |
Context for the local figures above. None of it is a Washington number.
| Figure | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| US locations | 9,107 | At the latest vintage, Q3 2026. |
| US locations at the window start | 9,152 | The first tracked vintage, Q4 2024. |
| Net new over the window | -45 | The difference between the two counts above. A count movement, not a count of openings. |
| Growth over the window | withheld: this brand's index coverage is still maturing — see the note under this table | Percentage change in the count between the first and latest vintages, nationwide. |
| Growth as a multiple | withheld: this brand's index coverage is still maturing — see the note under this table | The same movement stated as a multiple of the starting count. |
| Growth against its category | withheld: this brand's index coverage is still maturing — see the note under this table | The brand's percentage change minus its category's, so a rising tide is subtracted out. |
| Mean quarterly change | +280 | Average count movement per vintage step. The default ranking key on the hub. |
| Verified openings in the window | withheld: the opening records are supplier batches — see the note under this table | Individually dated location records new to the index inside the window, nationwide. |
| Openings pace, latest step | withheld: the opening records are supplier batches — see the note under this table | Verified openings per 91 days over the most recent vintage step. |
| Openings pace, prior step | withheld: the opening records are supplier batches — see the note under this table | The same measure one step earlier. |
| Direction | withheld: the opening records are supplier batches — see the note under this table | Accelerating, steady or slowing, decided on the two paces at the precision they are printed. |
| Latest pace as a share of the base | withheld: the opening records are supplier batches — see the note under this table | The latest pace over the store count at that step's start vintage. |
| Prior pace as a share of the base | withheld: the opening records are supplier batches — see the note under this table | The same measure one step earlier. |
| Reported openings pace, latest | +3.2 | The server's own pre-aggregated pace. Shown because the page ranks on the series-derived figure above and the two must agree. |
| Reported openings pace, prior | +5.9 | The same, one step earlier. |
| Largest single step's share of the change | — | One release carrying most of the movement is the signature of a data-coverage artifact rather than of openings. |
| Steps that moved the same direction | 43% | A real buildout moves one way most quarters. This and the row above are the credibility filter. |
| Passes the credibility filter | no | Largest step at or under half the movement, most steps in one direction, and net new above zero. |
| Cleared to print a percentage | no | Whether the index's coverage of this brand is mature enough for a rate to mean anything. |
| Openings corroborated by coverage | — | Share of the openings that agree with the count series over the same step. |
| Records matching the brand's own website | 98% | Share of index records whose website resolves to this domain. |
| Records sharing an address with another operator | 70% | High values mean host locations, sibling banners or shared kitchens rather than the chain's own leases. |
| Entity class | chain | Anything other than a chain is not published as a brand page in this state tier. |
| Category | Retail > Computers and Electronics Retail > Mobile Phone Store | The index's own category path for this brand. |
| Segment | Specialty Retail | The published grouping the category rolls up to. |
| Match name in the index | t mobile | The string the location index matches records against. Rarely the display name. |
| Display name | T-Mobile | As published. Some domains carry a read-time repair where the index's most frequent name is a department's. |
| Domain | t-mobile.com | The key every table on this tier is joined on. |
| Tracked window | 8 vintages, Q4 2024 to Q3 2026 | How many quarterly releases this brand has been measured across. |
| Vintage stamps | 2024-11-19|2024-12-03|2025-03-06|2025-06-10|2025-09-09|2025-12-16|2026-03-18|2026-07-09 | Every release these figures were built from, oldest first, pipe-separated. It is a LIST of dates rather than one date, which is why nothing on this page prints it as a timestamp. |
The national count series behind the figures above. Both readings of it — the raw count and the indexed one — are columns here.
| Quarter | Vintage date | US locations | Indexed | Change vs prior |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 2024 | 2024-11-19 | 9,152 | 100 | — |
| Q4 2024 | 2024-12-03 | 9,152 | 100 | 0 |
| Q1 2025 | 2025-03-06 | 9,291 | 102 | +139 |
| Q2 2025 | 2025-06-10 | 8,655 | 95 | -636 |
| Q3 2025 | 2025-09-09 | 8,647 | 94 | -8 |
| Q4 2025 | 2025-12-16 | 9,217 | 101 | +570 |
| Q1 2026 | 2026-03-18 | 9,148 | 100 | -69 |
| Q3 2026 | 2026-07-09 | 9,107 | 100 | -41 |
Each row is the difference between two consecutive releases, so there is one fewer step than there are quarters above.
| Step ends | Quarter | Openings | Step length | Pace | Batch-suspect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2024 | Q4 2024 | 1 | 14 | +6.5 | 0% |
| Mar 6, 2025 | Q1 2025 | 4 | 93 | +3.9 | 0% |
| Jun 10, 2025 | Q2 2025 | 6 | 96 | +5.7 | 17% |
| Sep 9, 2025 | Q3 2025 | 5 | 91 | +5 | 0% |
| Dec 16, 2025 | Q4 2025 | 581 | 98 | +540 | 98% |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Q1 2026 | 6 | 92 | +5.9 | 67% |
| Jul 9, 2026 | Q3 2026 | 4 | 113 | +3.2 | 50% |
Cobroker ranks the Washington trade areas that look like the ones T-Mobile already performs in — demographics, co-tenancy, traffic.
Run the free report →