heb.com · Grocery & Convenience · the Q3 2026 release
H-E-B has 1,115 locations in Texas, its largest state of the 2 it operates in.
See where H-E-B opens next →Every figure in this block is measured inside Texas. Nothing in it is a rate.
| Figure | Value | What it measures |
|---|---|---|
| Locations in Texas | 1,115 | Records the US location index holds for H-E-B inside Texas right now — a snapshot at the Q3 2026 release, not a change over time. |
| Rank among H-E-B's states | 1st of 2 | By location count, among the states where this brand clears the publication floor. |
| States with a published H-E-B page | 2 | States where the brand has at least 3 locations. Smaller states exist in the index and are not published. |
| Locations across those states | 1,118 | The sum of the state table below. Lower than the national count, which includes states under the floor. |
| Texas's share of that footprint | 99.7% | A share of the published states only. Both halves are the same measure, so this is not a growth rate. |
| Verified openings in Texas | 46 | A DIFFERENT measure from the count above: openings detected inside the tracked window, not stores standing today. |
| Cities with verified openings in Texas | 31 | Distinct cities after folding spelling variants. See the city table. |
Cities with verified openings recorded for H-E-B in Texas. The count beside each city is its openings — not its total H-E-B locations.
| City | Verified openings | Share of Texas openings | Spellings folded |
|---|---|---|---|
| Austin | 4 | 8.7% | 1 |
| San Antonio | 4 | 8.7% | 1 |
| Prosper | 3 | 6.5% | 1 |
| Cypress | 2 | 4.3% | 1 |
| Edinburg | 2 | 4.3% | 1 |
| Forney | 2 | 4.3% | 1 |
| Georgetown | 2 | 4.3% | 1 |
| Katy | 2 | 4.3% | 1 |
| Rockwall | 2 | 4.3% | 1 |
| Waxahachie | 2 | 4.3% | 1 |
| Boerne | 1 | 2.2% | 1 |
| Carrollton | 1 | 2.2% | 1 |
| Cibolo | 1 | 2.2% | 1 |
| Euless | 1 | 2.2% | 1 |
| Fort Worth | 1 | 2.2% | 1 |
| Frisco | 1 | 2.2% | 1 |
| Houston | 1 | 2.2% | 1 |
| Humble | 1 | 2.2% | 1 |
| Irving | 1 | 2.2% | 1 |
| Kingwood | 1 | 2.2% | 1 |
| Lakeway | 1 | 2.2% | 1 |
| Laredo | 1 | 2.2% | 1 |
| Leander | 1 | 2.2% | 1 |
| Lubbock | 1 | 2.2% | 1 |
| Lytle | 1 | 2.2% | 1 |
| Manor | 1 | 2.2% | 1 |
| Melissa | 1 | 2.2% | 1 |
| Midland | 1 | 2.2% | 1 |
| Plano | 1 | 2.2% | 1 |
| Temple | 1 | 2.2% | 1 |
| West Columbia | 1 | 2.2% | 1 |
The brand's whole published footprint, largest first. Texas is highlighted in place.
| Rank | State | Locations | Share of footprint |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Texas — this page | 1,115 | 99.7% |
| 2 | Florida | 3 | 0.3% |
Context for the local figures above. None of it is a Texas number.
| Figure | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| US locations | 1,134 | At the latest vintage, Q3 2026. |
| US locations at the window start | 1,096 | The first tracked vintage, Q4 2024. |
| Net new over the window | +38 | The difference between the two counts above. A count movement, not a count of openings. |
| Growth over the window | +3.5% | Percentage change in the count between the first and latest vintages, nationwide. |
| Growth as a multiple | 1.0x | The same movement stated as a multiple of the starting count. |
| Growth against its category | +3.5% | The brand's percentage change minus its category's, so a rising tide is subtracted out. |
| Mean quarterly change | +4.5 | Average count movement per vintage step. The default ranking key on the hub. |
| Verified openings in the window | 46 | Individually dated location records new to the index inside the window, nationwide. |
| Openings pace, latest step | +7.2 | Verified openings per 91 days over the most recent vintage step. |
| Openings pace, prior step | +14 | The same measure one step earlier. |
| Direction | slowing | Accelerating, steady or slowing, decided on the two paces at the precision they are printed. |
| Latest pace as a share of the base | +0.6% | The latest pace over the store count at that step's start vintage. |
| Prior pace as a share of the base | +1.2% | The same measure one step earlier. |
| Reported openings pace, latest | +7.2 | The server's own pre-aggregated pace. Shown because the page ranks on the series-derived figure above and the two must agree. |
| Reported openings pace, prior | +14 | The same, one step earlier. |
| Largest single step's share of the change | 37% | One release carrying most of the movement is the signature of a data-coverage artifact rather than of openings. |
| Steps that moved the same direction | 71% | A real buildout moves one way most quarters. This and the row above are the credibility filter. |
| Passes the credibility filter | no | Largest step at or under half the movement, most steps in one direction, and net new above zero. |
| Cleared to print a percentage | yes | Whether the index's coverage of this brand is mature enough for a rate to mean anything. |
| Openings corroborated by coverage | 121% | Share of the openings that agree with the count series over the same step. |
| Records matching the brand's own website | 97% | Share of index records whose website resolves to this domain. |
| Records sharing an address with another operator | 33% | High values mean host locations, sibling banners or shared kitchens rather than the chain's own leases. |
| Entity class | chain | Anything other than a chain is not published as a brand page in this state tier. |
| Category | Retail > Food and Beverage Retail > Grocery Store | The index's own category path for this brand. |
| Segment | Grocery & Convenience | The published grouping the category rolls up to. |
| Match name in the index | h e b | The string the location index matches records against. Rarely the display name. |
| Display name | H-E-B | As published. Some domains carry a read-time repair where the index's most frequent name is a department's. |
| Domain | heb.com | The key every table on this tier is joined on. |
| Tracked window | 8 vintages, Q4 2024 to Q3 2026 | How many quarterly releases this brand has been measured across. |
| Vintage stamps | 2024-11-19|2024-12-03|2025-03-06|2025-06-10|2025-09-09|2025-12-16|2026-03-18|2026-07-09 | Every release these figures were built from, oldest first, pipe-separated. It is a LIST of dates rather than one date, which is why nothing on this page prints it as a timestamp. |
The national count series behind the figures above. Both readings of it — the raw count and the indexed one — are columns here.
| Quarter | Vintage date | US locations | Indexed | Change vs prior |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 2024 | 2024-11-19 | 1,096 | 100 | — |
| Q4 2024 | 2024-12-03 | 1,095 | 100 | -1 |
| Q1 2025 | 2025-03-06 | 1,099 | 100 | +4 |
| Q2 2025 | 2025-06-10 | 1,107 | 101 | +8 |
| Q3 2025 | 2025-09-09 | 1,110 | 101 | +3 |
| Q4 2025 | 2025-12-16 | 1,109 | 101 | -1 |
| Q1 2026 | 2026-03-18 | 1,123 | 102 | +14 |
| Q3 2026 | 2026-07-09 | 1,134 | 103 | +11 |
Each row is the difference between two consecutive releases, so there is one fewer step than there are quarters above.
| Step ends | Quarter | Openings | Step length | Pace | Batch-suspect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2024 | Q4 2024 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0% |
| Mar 6, 2025 | Q1 2025 | 4 | 93 | +3.9 | 0% |
| Jun 10, 2025 | Q2 2025 | 5 | 96 | +4.7 | 0% |
| Sep 9, 2025 | Q3 2025 | 4 | 91 | +4 | 0% |
| Dec 16, 2025 | Q4 2025 | 10 | 98 | +9.3 | 30% |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Q1 2026 | 14 | 92 | +14 | 29% |
| Jul 9, 2026 | Q3 2026 | 9 | 113 | +7.2 | 22% |
Cobroker ranks the Texas trade areas that look like the ones H-E-B already performs in — demographics, co-tenancy, traffic.
Run the free report →