Dollar General in Oklahoma

dollargeneral.com · Discount & Value · the Q3 2026 release

Dollar General has 635 locations in Oklahoma, its 18th-largest state of the 48 it operates in.

Every figure in this block is measured inside Oklahoma. Nothing in it is a rate.

Dollar General: local figures for Oklahoma.
Figure	Value	What it measures~~Oklahoma only~~
Locations in Oklahoma	635	Records the US location index holds for Dollar General inside Oklahoma right now — a snapshot at the Q3 2026 release, not a change over time.
Rank among Dollar General's states	18th of 48	By location count, among the states where this brand clears the publication floor.
States with a published Dollar General page	48	States where the brand has at least 3 locations. Smaller states exist in the index and are not published.
Locations across those states	23,336	The sum of the state table below. Lower than the national count, which includes states under the floor.
Oklahoma's share of that footprint	2.7%	A share of the published states only. Both halves are the same measure, so this is not a growth rate.
Index opening records in Oklahoma	72	A DIFFERENT measure from the count above: openings detected inside the tracked window, not stores standing today.
Cities with index opening records in Oklahoma	62	Distinct cities after folding spelling variants. See the city table.

The two counts above are measured differently and are both correct. Locations in Oklahoma is a presence snapshot of what operates there now; index opening records counts what opened inside the tracked window. A chain that already had 40 locations in Oklahoma and opened none reads 0 openings.
It is a count of OPENINGS, not of stores. Openings are diffs against the previous release, so a mature operator that finished its Oklahoma buildout before the window opened shows a large location count and no openings at all.
Dollar General's opening records arrive overwhelmingly as supplier batches rather than as dated store openings, so they are labelled index opening records and no quarterly pace is published from them.

Where Dollar General has opened in Oklahoma

Cities with index opening records recorded for Dollar General in Oklahoma. The count beside each city is its openings — not its total Dollar General locations.

Dollar General index opening records by city in Oklahoma, largest first.
City~~modal spelling in the index~~	Index opening records~~inside Oklahoma~~	Share of Oklahoma openings	Spellings folded~~raw variants in the index~~
Oklahoma City	3	4.2%	2
Tulsa	3	4.2%	2
ENID	2	2.8%	1
Guthrie	2	2.8%	1
Mannford	2	2.8%	2
Mead	2	2.8%	2
Muskogee	2	2.8%	1
Ponca City	2	2.8%	1
AGRA	1	1.4%	1
Ardmore	1	1.4%	1
Asher	1	1.4%	1
Bartlesville	1	1.4%	1
Bluejacket	1	1.4%	1
Broken Arrow	1	1.4%	1
Byng	1	1.4%	1
Checotah	1	1.4%	1
Chickasha	1	1.4%	1
Claremore	1	1.4%	1
Cleveland	1	1.4%	1
Colcord	1	1.4%	1
DEWAR	1	1.4%	1
Duncan	1	1.4%	1
Eagletown	1	1.4%	1
Elmore City	1	1.4%	1
Fletcher	1	1.4%	1
Gans	1	1.4%	1
GARVIN	1	1.4%	1
GLENCOE	1	1.4%	1
Granite	1	1.4%	1
Haileyville	1	1.4%	1
Howe	1	1.4%	1
Hugo	1	1.4%	1
Keota	1	1.4%	1
Kingston	1	1.4%	1
Kiowa	1	1.4%	1
Lawton	1	1.4%	1
Madill	1	1.4%	1
Mannsville	1	1.4%	1
McAlester	1	1.4%	1
Milburn	1	1.4%	1
MORRISON	1	1.4%	1
Mustang	1	1.4%	1
Noble	1	1.4%	1
Oilton	1	1.4%	1
Okeene	1	1.4%	1
Okmulgee	1	1.4%	1
OLUSTEE	1	1.4%	1
Oologah	1	1.4%	1
Salina	1	1.4%	1
Sapulpa	1	1.4%	1
Shawnee	1	1.4%	1
Soper	1	1.4%	1
South Coffeyville	1	1.4%	1
Spiro	1	1.4%	1
STONEWALL	1	1.4%	1
Talala	1	1.4%	1
TWIN OAKS	1	1.4%	1
WAPANUCKA	1	1.4%	1
WAYNOKA	1	1.4%	1
Welch	1	1.4%	1
Welling	1	1.4%	1
YUKON	1	1.4%	1

62 cities with index opening records in Oklahoma.
Spellings are folded the same way the city URLs are built, so "St. Louis" and "St Louis" are one city rather than two. The most frequent raw spelling wins the label; "Spellings folded" is how many the index actually holds.
Cities are NOT linked: a city page is published only where at least three brands clear the floor, so a link from here would frequently point at a page that does not exist.

Dollar General in every state we publish

The brand's whole published footprint, largest first. Oklahoma is highlighted in place.

Dollar General locations by state.
Rank	State	Locations~~presence snapshot~~	Share of footprint~~published states only~~
1	Texas	2,166	9.3%
2	Georgia	1,272	5.5%
3	North Carolina	1,257	5.4%
4	Florida	1,237	5.3%
5	Ohio	1,189	5.1%
6	Tennessee	1,166	5.0%
7	Pennsylvania	1,149	4.9%
8	Alabama	1,070	4.6%
9	Kentucky	905	3.9%
10	Michigan	848	3.6%
11	Indiana	826	3.5%
12	Illinois	816	3.5%
13	Missouri	804	3.4%
14	Louisiana	770	3.3%
15	South Carolina	759	3.3%
16	Mississippi	734	3.1%
17	New York	719	3.1%
18	Oklahoma — this page	635	2.7%
19	Arkansas	625	2.7%
20	Virginia	545	2.3%
21	Iowa	392	1.7%
22	West Virginia	358	1.5%
23	Wisconsin	349	1.5%
24	Kansas	316	1.4%
25	California	274	1.2%
26	Minnesota	252	1.1%
27	New Jersey	234	1.0%
28	Maryland	197	0.8%
29	Arizona	174	0.7%
30	Nebraska	168	0.7%
31	New Mexico	163	0.7%
32	Connecticut	112	0.5%
33	Colorado	99	0.4%
34	South Dakota	96	0.4%
35	Oregon	93	0.4%
36	North Dakota	82	0.4%
37	Maine	76	0.3%
38	Massachusetts	73	0.3%
39	Delaware	61	0.3%
40	New Hampshire	55	0.2%
41	Washington	51	0.2%
42	Vermont	46	0.2%
43	Wyoming	31	0.1%
44	Rhode Island	28	0.1%
45	Nevada	24	0.1%
46	Utah	19	0.1%
47	Montana	12	0.1%
48	Idaho	9	0.0%

A state appears here only with at least 3 locations. States below the floor are in the index but have no page, so this total is smaller than the national count.
Locations are a presence snapshot at the Q3 2026 release. They are not openings and they are not a change.

Dollar General nationwide

Context for the local figures above. None of it is a Oklahoma number.

Dollar General: national figures, for context only.
Figure	Value~~United States~~	Basis
US locations	23,430	At the latest vintage, Q3 2026.
US locations at the window start	22,657	The first tracked vintage, Q4 2024.
Net new over the window	+773	The difference between the two counts above. A count movement, not a count of openings.
Growth over the window	+3.4%	Percentage change in the count between the first and latest vintages, nationwide.
Growth as a multiple	1.0x	The same movement stated as a multiple of the starting count.
Growth against its category	+3.4%	The brand's percentage change minus its category's, so a rising tide is subtracted out.
Mean quarterly change	+673	Average count movement per vintage step. The default ranking key on the hub.
Verified openings in the window	withheld: the opening records are supplier batches — see the note under this table	Individually dated location records new to the index inside the window, nationwide.
Openings pace, latest step	withheld: the opening records are supplier batches — see the note under this table	Verified openings per 91 days over the most recent vintage step.
Openings pace, prior step	withheld: the opening records are supplier batches — see the note under this table	The same measure one step earlier.
Direction	withheld: the opening records are supplier batches — see the note under this table	Accelerating, steady or slowing, decided on the two paces at the precision they are printed.
Latest pace as a share of the base	withheld: the opening records are supplier batches — see the note under this table	The latest pace over the store count at that step's start vintage.
Prior pace as a share of the base	withheld: the opening records are supplier batches — see the note under this table	The same measure one step earlier.
Reported openings pace, latest	+190	The server's own pre-aggregated pace. Shown because the page ranks on the series-derived figure above and the two must agree.
Reported openings pace, prior	+713	The same, one step earlier.
Largest single step's share of the change	91%	One release carrying most of the movement is the signature of a data-coverage artifact rather than of openings.
Steps that moved the same direction	57%	A real buildout moves one way most quarters. This and the row above are the credibility filter.
Passes the credibility filter	no	Largest step at or under half the movement, most steps in one direction, and net new above zero.
Cleared to print a percentage	yes	Whether the index's coverage of this brand is mature enough for a rate to mean anything.
Openings corroborated by coverage	150%	Share of the openings that agree with the count series over the same step.
Records matching the brand's own website	100%	Share of index records whose website resolves to this domain.
Records sharing an address with another operator	14%	High values mean host locations, sibling banners or shared kitchens rather than the chain's own leases.
Entity class	chain	Anything other than a chain is not published as a brand page in this state tier.
Category	Retail > Discount Store	The index's own category path for this brand.
Segment	Discount & Value	The published grouping the category rolls up to.
Match name in the index	dollar general	The string the location index matches records against. Rarely the display name.
Display name	Dollar General	As published. Some domains carry a read-time repair where the index's most frequent name is a department's.
Domain	dollargeneral.com	The key every table on this tier is joined on.
Tracked window	8 vintages, Q4 2024 to Q3 2026	How many quarterly releases this brand has been measured across.
Vintage stamps	2024-11-19\|2024-12-03\|2025-03-06\|2025-06-10\|2025-09-09\|2025-12-16\|2026-03-18\|2026-07-09	Every release these figures were built from, oldest first, pipe-separated. It is a LIST of dates rather than one date, which is why nothing on this page prints it as a timestamp.

Every figure in this block is NATIONAL. It is identical on all 48 of Dollar General's state pages and is not apportioned to Oklahoma — dividing a national percentage into a state is not a fact about anything, which is why no Oklahoma growth rate is published anywhere on this page.
Openings are individually dated records new to the index; net new is the difference between two count snapshots. The two answer different questions and rarely match.
Dollar General's opening records arrive overwhelmingly as supplier batches rather than as dated store openings, so they are labelled index opening records and no quarterly pace is published from them.

Dollar General's count by quarter, nationwide

The national count series behind the figures above. Both readings of it — the raw count and the indexed one — are columns here.

Dollar General: US locations at each tracked vintage.
Quarter	Vintage date	US locations	Indexed~~100 = first vintage~~	Change vs prior
Q4 2024	2024-11-19	22,657	100	—
Q4 2024	2024-12-03	22,654	100	-3
Q1 2025	2025-03-06	22,640	100	-14
Q2 2025	2025-06-10	21,763	96	-877
Q3 2025	2025-09-09	21,945	97	+182
Q4 2025	2025-12-16	22,519	99	+574
Q1 2026	2026-03-18	23,224	103	+705
Q3 2026	2026-07-09	23,430	103	+206

Indexed values rebase the series to 100 at the first vintage with a non-zero count. A brand first measured at zero enters at 0 and reaches 100 one step later.
National figures. Not apportioned to any state.

Dollar General's openings by vintage step, nationwide

Each row is the difference between two consecutive releases, so there is one fewer step than there are quarters above.

Dollar General: index opening records per vintage step, with the real step length each pace is normalised by.
Step ends	Quarter	Openings~~in the step~~	Step length~~days~~	Pace~~per 91 days~~	Batch-suspect~~share of the step~~
Dec 3, 2024	Q4 2024	0	14	0	0%
Mar 6, 2025	Q1 2025	18	93	+18	0%
Jun 10, 2025	Q2 2025	274	96	+260	95%
Sep 9, 2025	Q3 2025	200	91	+200	87%
Dec 16, 2025	Q4 2025	626	98	+581	92%
Mar 18, 2026	Q1 2026	721	92	+713	99%
Jul 9, 2026	Q3 2026	236	113	+190	95%

Steps are irregular, so a pace is openings divided by the step's real length and multiplied by 91 days rather than a raw quarterly count.
A batch-suspect share above half means the records were created on an index-wide vendor ingest day or bunched into a few days of the step; it impeaches the timing, not the existence of the stores.
National figures. Not apportioned to any state.

Where should Dollar General open next in Oklahoma?

Cobroker ranks the Oklahoma trade areas that look like the ones Dollar General already performs in — demographics, co-tenancy, traffic.

Run the free report →